Reflective Writing Assignments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Reflective Writing Assignments - Essay ExampleHowever, there should be a limit to the salvage exit since it shadow be disastrous at times (Campbell 9). A initiation without dispense with depart but with only good things happening is an incomplete realism. This is because free exit is an important comp peerlessnt of life, and thus without it life can be sometimes unbearable. Conversely, a introduction where the social movement of free get out leads to occurrence of bad things is not good either. This is because people misuse the free depart accorded to perform evil actions that may sometimes end up being disastrous (Campbell 13). This is because everyone perceives free will as the right to behave or do things that only pleases without considering the impact of such actions to fellow homophile beings. However, when comparing the 2 scenarios, it is better for one to live in a world without free will but has good things happening to him rather than live in a world with free will but the freedom look ats him do evil things that at times prove disastrous. A world without free will is good since even though a person is denied the freedom of choice, he is not undefended to bad things associated with free will. For instance, a person can live without free will but he is properly treated and therefore, exposed to good things. This is because the person is only denied freedom of choice while accorded another(prenominal) good things of life, which might make life more bearable. This is true since at times the presence of free will exposes an individual to bad things for instance, freedom of choice might lead a person to make wrong decisions with chafe consequences (Campbell 18). Consequently, a world with free will is not good and forms a unreliable place since the freedom makes an individual perform evil actions. Thus, the free will leads to the occurrence of bad things with grave consequences. For instance, a world where each person is permitted to ki ll, maim, or even oppress one another is a bad place to live in since life becomes unbearable. In such world, people become despiteful and so evil because there is no law or person dictating the free will. Therefore, since no benevolent being prefers facing or experiencing bad things in life, it is better to live in a world with lots of good things but without free will. This is because there is more suffering in a world with free will since every person does what pleases him or her without considering the consequences of such action to other people inwardly the surroundings (Campbell 25). For instance, in a world without freedom, an individual might decide to play booming unison late in the night without considering the unnecessary noise and inconveniences caused to the sleepy neighbors. In a retaliatory attack, the neighbors might decide to attack and severely beat him since there is no law restricting them from doing such an action. From the two scenarios, it is clear that al though free will is important in the world, too much of it is so dangerous since it can lead to the occurrence of bad things. Due to such scenarios, it is better to live in a world where freedom is restricted to avoid occurrence of bad things attributed to the free will. At to the lowest degree such a world will have minimal records of bad things occurring and this will make life at least bearable and enjoyable. (634 words) Q2. Is it okay to spend one being in order to save one pace human beings? Is it okay to assassinate one human being in order to save one thousand human beings? Is it okay to draw up a battle plan that deliberately be the lives of